1. Cell Membrane Integrity: Does the Spray Damage Cells?
The cell membrane acts as a protective barrier. If it’s damaged, cells become more vulnerable. We measured this using Transepithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER)—a lower TEER value means more damage.
✔️ Our spray caused only mild disruptions due to surfactants.
✔️ Membrane integrity was better preserved than in cells exposed to conventional cleaning products.
2. Cell Damage (Cytotoxicity): Do the Cells Stay Intact?
We tracked cell damage by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), an enzyme that leaks out when membranes are damaged.
✔️ Our spray caused less LDH release than conventional products, suggesting a milder toxicological profile.
✔️ Some minor cell damage (up to 15%) was observed, but this was expected. In contrast, commercial cleaners caused significantly more damage.
✔️ LDH levels were identical with and without bacteria, confirming that the bacteria themselves did not contribute to extra cell stress.
3. Cell Viability: Do the Cells Stay Alive?
We tested how many cells remained healthy after exposure using a PrestoBlue® assay, which measures metabolic activity.
✔️ Cell viability ranged from 39-65% after exposure to our spray—significantly better than commercial cleaners.
✔️ Commercial products resulted in 0% viability—total cell death.
✔️ The bacteria had no negative effect on viability.
4. Cilia Movement: Do the Lungs Keep Their Natural Defenses?
Cilia are tiny hair-like structures in the lungs that help clear out dust, bacteria, and other particles. Their movement is crucial for respiratory health.
✔️ Our spray preserved up to 69% of normal ciliary activity.
✔️ Commercial cleaners completely disrupted this function, likely due to cell damage.
This suggests that our cleaner has a significantly milder impact on lung function compared to conventional products.